CIS: Market for Oleohydraulic Power Transmission Control Valve 2019

Market Size for Valves For The Control Of Oleohydraulic Power Transmission For Pipes, Boiler Shells, Tanks And Vats in CIS

The revenue of the oleohydraulic power transmission control valve market in CIS amounted to $X in 2017, surging by X% against the previous year. The market value increased an average annual rate of +X% from 2007 to 2017; the trend pattern indicated some noticeable fluctuations throughout the analyzed period. The growth pace was the most rapid in 2008, when market value increased by X% against the previous year. The level of consumption of valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats peaked of $X in 2013; however, from 2014 to 2017, it stood at a somewhat lower level.

Production of Valves For The Control Of Oleohydraulic Power Transmission For Pipes, Boiler Shells, Tanks And Vats in CIS

In 2017, production of valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats in CIS amounted to X units, reducing by -X% against the previous year. The production of valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats continues to indicate a relatively flat trend pattern. The pace of growth appeared the most rapid in 2009, when the output figure increased by X% against the previous year. Over the period under review, the production of valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats reached its maximum volume of X units in 2016, and then declined slightly in the following year.

Exports of Valves For The Control Of Oleohydraulic Power Transmission For Pipes, Boiler Shells, Tanks And Vats in CIS

In 2017, the amount of valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats exported in CIS totaled X units, falling by -X% against the previous year. The exports of valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats continue to indicate a measured expansion. The pace of growth appeared the most rapid in 2012, when exports increased by X% y-o-y. Over the period under review, the exports of valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats attained its maximum volume of X units in 2014; however, from 2015 to 2017, it stood at a somewhat lower level.

In value terms, exports of valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats totaled $X in 2017. The exports of valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats continue to indicate a notable growth. Over the period under review, the exports of valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats reached its peak figure level of $X in 2014; however, from 2015 to 2017, it failed to regain its momentum.

Exports of Valves For The Control Of Oleohydraulic Power Transmission For Pipes, Boiler Shells, Tanks And Vats by Country in CIS

Russia represented the key exporter of valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats in CIS, with the volume of exports finishing at X units, which was approx. X% of total exports in 2017. It was distantly followed by Belarus (X units), generating X% share of total exports. Kazakhstan (X units) followed a long way behind the leaders.

From 2007 to 2017, the most notable rate of growth in terms of exports, amongst the main exporting countries, was attained by Kazakhstan (+X% per year), while the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, Russia ($X) remains the largest oleohydraulic power transmission control valve supplier in CIS, making up X% of global exports. The second position in the ranking was occupied by Belarus ($X), with a X% share of global exports. It was followed by Kazakhstan, with a X% share.

From 2007 to 2017, the average annual growth rate of value in Russia stood at +X%. In the other countries, the average annual rates were as follows: Belarus (+X% per year) and Kazakhstan (+X% per year).

Export Prices for Valves For The Control Of Oleohydraulic Power Transmission For Pipes, Boiler Shells, Tanks And Vats by Country in CIS

The export price for valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats in CIS stood at $X per unit in 2017, increasing by X% against the previous year. Over the period from 2007 to 2017, it increased at an average annual rate of +X%. The pace of growth was the most pronounced in 2008, when it surged by X% y-o-y. In that year, the export prices for valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats attained their peak level of $X per unit. From 2009 to 2017, growth of the export prices for valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats failed to regain its momentum.

There were significant differences in the average export prices amongst the major exporting countries. In 2017, the country with the highest export price was Russia ($X per unit), while Belarus ($X per unit) was amongst the lowest.

From 2007 to 2017, the most notable rate of growth in terms of export prices was attained by Kazakhstan (+X% per year), while the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Imports of Valves For The Control Of Oleohydraulic Power Transmission For Pipes, Boiler Shells, Tanks And Vats in CIS

In 2017, the amount of valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats imported in CIS stood at X units, going up by X% against the previous year. The total imports indicated a strong increase from 2007 to 2017: its volume increased at an average annual rate of +X% over the last decade. The trend pattern, however, indicated some noticeable fluctuations throughout the analyzed period. Based on 2017 figures, the imports of valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats increased by +X% against 2015 indices. The most prominent rate of growth was recorded in 2010, when it surged by X% against the previous year. The volume of imports peaked in 2017, and are expected to retain its growth in the near future.

In value terms, imports of valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats stood at $X in 2017. The total imports indicated a remarkable increase from 2007 to 2017: its value increased at an average annual rate of +X% over the last decade. The trend pattern, however, indicated some noticeable fluctuations throughout the analyzed period. Based on 2017 figures, the imports of valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats increased by +X% against 2015 indices. Over the period under review, the imports of valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats attained its maximum level of $X in 2013; however, from 2014 to 2017, it failed to regain its momentum.

Imports of Valves For The Control Of Oleohydraulic Power Transmission For Pipes, Boiler Shells, Tanks And Vats by Country in CIS

Russia dominates imports of valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats structure, accounting for X units, which was approx. X% of total imports in 2017. Kazakhstan (X units) ranks second in terms of the global imports with a X% share, followed by Belarus (X%). Azerbaijan (X units) occupied the weak share of total imports.

From 2007 to 2017, average annual rates of growth with regard to oleohydraulic power transmission control valve imports into Russia stood at +X%. At the same time, Azerbaijan (+X%), Kazakhstan (+X%) and Belarus (+X%) displayed positive paces of growth. Moreover, Azerbaijan emerged as the fastest growing importer in CIS, with a CAGR of +X% from 2007-2017. From 2007 to 2017, the share of Kazakhstan and Russia decreased by -X% and -X% percentage points, while the shares of the other countries remained relatively stable throughout the analyzed period.

In value terms, Russia ($X) constitutes the largest market for imported valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats in CIS, making up X% of global imports. The second position in the ranking was occupied by Kazakhstan ($X), with a X% share of global imports. It was followed by Belarus, with a X% share.

From 2007 to 2017, the average annual rate of growth in terms of value in Russia totaled +X%. In the other countries, the average annual rates were as follows: Kazakhstan (+X% per year) and Belarus (+X% per year).

Import Prices for Valves For The Control Of Oleohydraulic Power Transmission For Pipes, Boiler Shells, Tanks And Vats by Country in CIS

The import price for valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats in CIS stood at $X per unit in 2017, coming down by -X% against the previous year. The import price for valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats continues to indicate a relatively flat trend pattern. The growth pace was the most rapid in 2011, when the import prices increased by X% year-to-year. In that year, the import prices for valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats reached their peak level of $X per unit. From 2012 to 2017, growth of the import prices for valves for the control of oleohydraulic power transmission for pipes, boiler shells, tanks and vats failed to regain its momentum.

Import prices varied noticeably by the country of destination; the country with the highest import price was Azerbaijan ($X per unit), while Russia ($X per unit) was amongst the lowest.

From 2007 to 2017, the most notable rate of growth in terms of import prices was attained by Kazakhstan (-X% per year), while the other leaders experienced a decline in the import price figures.

Source: IndexBox Platform