New Zealand: Market for Footwear of Rubber or Plastics, not Waterproof, not Sports, without a Metal Toe-Cap 2025

Market Size for Footwear of Rubber or Plastics, not Waterproof, not Sports, without a Metal Toe-Cap in New Zealand

After two years of decline, the New Zealand market for footwear of rubber or plastics, not waterproof, not sports, without a metal toe-cap increased by 32% to $X in 2021. Over the period under review, consumption, however, showed a perceptible shrinkage. Consumption of peaked at $X in 2012; however, from 2013 to 2021, consumption stood at a somewhat lower figure.

Exports of Footwear of Rubber or Plastics, not Waterproof, not Sports, without a Metal Toe-Cap

Exports from New Zealand

In 2021, overseas shipments of footwear of rubber or plastics, not waterproof, not sports, without a metal toe-cap were finally on the rise to reach X tons after two years of decline. Over the period under review, exports, however, showed a deep reduction. The pace of growth was the most pronounced in 2018 with an increase of 37%. The exports peaked at X tons in 2013; however, from 2014 to 2021, the exports failed to regain momentum.

In value terms, exports of footwear of rubber or plastics, not waterproof, not sports, without a metal toe-cap skyrocketed to $X in 2021. Overall, exports, however, recorded a abrupt slump. The pace of growth appeared the most rapid in 2018 with an increase of 73%. The exports peaked at $X in 2013; however, from 2014 to 2021, the exports remained at a lower figure.

Exports by Country

Australia (X tons) was the main destination for exports of footwear of rubber or plastics, not waterproof, not sports, without a metal toe-cap from New Zealand, with a 41% share of total exports. Moreover, exports of footwear of rubber or plastics, not waterproof, not sports, without a metal toe-cap to Australia exceeded the volume sent to the second major destination, Malaysia (X tons), twofold. The third position in this ranking was held by Singapore (X tons), with a 9% share.

From 2012 to 2021, the average annual rate of growth in terms of volume to Australia stood at -17.4%. Exports to the other major destinations recorded the following average annual rates of exports growth: Malaysia (+58.0% per year) and Singapore (+15.6% per year).

In value terms, the largest markets for footwear of rubber or plastics, not waterproof, not sports, without a metal toe-cap exported from New Zealand were Australia ($X), Malaysia ($X) and Singapore ($X), with a combined 72% share of total exports.

Among the main countries of destination, Malaysia, with a CAGR of +62.4%, recorded the highest rates of growth with regard to the value of exports, over the period under review, while shipments for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Export Prices by Country

In 2021, the average export price for footwear of rubber or plastics, not waterproof, not sports, without a metal toe-cap amounted to $X per ton, which is down by -6.9% against the previous year. Over the last nine years, it increased at an average annual rate of +1.6%. The most prominent rate of growth was recorded in 2014 an increase of 28% against the previous year. As a result, the export price reached the peak level of $X per ton. From 2015 to 2021, the average export prices failed to regain momentum.

Prices varied noticeably by country of destination: amid the top suppliers, the country with the highest price was Malaysia ($X per ton), while the average price for exports to Vanuatu ($X per ton) was amongst the lowest.

From 2012 to 2021, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was recorded for supplies to Malaysia (+2.7%), while the prices for the other major destinations experienced more modest paces of growth.

Imports of Footwear of Rubber or Plastics, not Waterproof, not Sports, without a Metal Toe-Cap

Imports into New Zealand

In 2021, purchases abroad of footwear of rubber or plastics, not waterproof, not sports, without a metal toe-cap was finally on the rise to reach X tons after two years of decline. Over the period under review, imports, however, saw a deep reduction. Imports peaked at X tons in 2012; however, from 2013 to 2021, imports remained at a lower figure.

In value terms, imports of footwear of rubber or plastics, not waterproof, not sports, without a metal toe-cap soared to $X in 2021. Overall, imports, however, recorded a relatively flat trend pattern. Imports peaked at $X in 2018; however, from 2019 to 2021, imports stood at a somewhat lower figure.

Imports by Country

In 2021, China (X tons) constituted the largest supplier of footwear of rubber or plastics, not waterproof, not sports, without a metal toe-cap to New Zealand, accounting for a 67% share of total imports. Moreover, imports of footwear of rubber or plastics, not waterproof, not sports, without a metal toe-cap from China exceeded the figures recorded by the second-largest supplier, Vietnam (X tons), fourfold. Indonesia (X tons) ranked third in terms of total imports with a 5.6% share.

From 2012 to 2021, the average annual rate of growth in terms of volume from China stood at -10.9%. The remaining supplying countries recorded the following average annual rates of imports growth: Vietnam (+5.1% per year) and Indonesia (+9.5% per year).

In value terms, China ($X) constituted the largest supplier of footwear of rubber or plastics, not waterproof, not sports, without a metal toe-cap to New Zealand, comprising 67% of total imports. The second position in the ranking was taken by Vietnam ($X), with a 16% share of total imports. It was followed by Indonesia, with a 5.9% share.

From 2012 to 2021, the average annual rate of growth in terms of value from China amounted to -3.2%. The remaining supplying countries recorded the following average annual rates of imports growth: Vietnam (+12.7% per year) and Indonesia (+16.6% per year).

Import Prices by Country

In 2021, the average import price for footwear of rubber or plastics, not waterproof, not sports, without a metal toe-cap amounted to $X per ton, stabilizing at the previous year. Overall, the import price, however, recorded buoyant growth. The most prominent rate of growth was recorded in 2015 an increase of 65% against the previous year. The import price peaked at $X per ton in 2020, and then dropped slightly in the following year.

Prices varied noticeably by country of origin: amid the top importers, the country with the highest price was Italy ($X per ton), while the price for Brazil ($X per ton) was amongst the lowest.

From 2012 to 2021, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by China (+8.7%), while the prices for the other major suppliers experienced more modest paces of growth.

Source: IndexBox Platform

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) :