Peru: Anti-Oxidising Preparations Market 2024

Anti-Oxidising Preparations Market Size in Peru

The Peruvian anti-oxidising preparations market stood at less than $X in 2022, flattening at the previous year. Overall, consumption continues to indicate a relatively flat trend pattern. The pace of growth appeared the most rapid in 2016 with an increase of X%. Anti-oxidising preparations consumption peaked at $X in 2012; however, from 2013 to 2022, consumption failed to regain momentum.

Anti-Oxidising Preparations Production in Peru

In value terms, anti-oxidising preparations production amounted to less than $X in 2022 estimated in export price. In general, production continues to indicate a noticeable descent. The pace of growth appeared the most rapid in 2016 with an increase of X%. Anti-oxidising preparations production peaked at $X in 2012; however, from 2013 to 2022, production stood at a somewhat lower figure.

Anti-Oxidising Preparations Exports

Exports from Peru

In 2016, exports of anti-oxidising preparations and other compounds stabilisers for rubber or plastics from Peru fell sharply to X tons, with a decrease of X% against the previous year's figure. In general, exports continue to indicate a deep setback. The pace of growth appeared the most rapid in 2014 when exports increased by X%. As a result, the exports reached the peak of X tons. From 2015 to 2016, the growth of the exports failed to regain momentum.

In value terms, anti-oxidising preparations exports declined markedly to $X in 2016. Over the period under review, exports continue to indicate a abrupt shrinkage. The most prominent rate of growth was recorded in 2014 when exports increased by X% against the previous year. As a result, the exports reached the peak of $X. From 2015 to 2016, the growth of the exports failed to regain momentum.

Exports by Country

Ecuador (X tons) was the main destination for anti-oxidising preparations exports from Peru, with a X% share of total exports. Moreover, anti-oxidising preparations exports to Ecuador exceeded the volume sent to the second major destination, Mexico (X tons), eightfold. Colombia (X tons) ranked third in terms of total exports with a X% share.

From 2012 to 2016, the average annual rate of growth in terms of volume to Ecuador was relatively modest. Exports to the other major destinations recorded the following average annual rates of exports growth: Mexico (X% per year) and Colombia (X% per year).

In value terms, Ecuador ($X) remains the key foreign market for anti-oxidising preparations and other compounds stabilisers for rubber or plastics exports from Peru, comprising X% of total exports. The second position in the ranking was held by Mexico ($X), with a X% share of total exports. It was followed by Colombia, with a X% share.

From 2012 to 2016, the average annual growth rate of value to Ecuador was relatively modest. Exports to the other major destinations recorded the following average annual rates of exports growth: Mexico (X% per year) and Colombia (X% per year).

Export Prices by Country

The average anti-oxidising preparations export price stood at $X per ton in 2016, with a decrease of X% against the previous year. Over the period under review, the export price saw a relatively flat trend pattern. The most prominent rate of growth was recorded in 2015 when the average export price increased by X%. The export price peaked at $X per ton in 2012; afterwards, it flattened through to 2016.

Average prices varied somewhat for the major foreign markets. In 2016, amid the top suppliers, the highest price was recorded for prices to Free Zones ($X per ton) and Ecuador ($X per ton), while the average price for exports to Chile ($X per ton) and Venezuela ($X per ton) were amongst the lowest.

From 2012 to 2016, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was recorded for supplies to Free Zones (X%), while the prices for the other major destinations experienced a decline.

Anti-Oxidising Preparations Imports

Imports into Peru

In 2016, purchases abroad of anti-oxidising preparations and other compounds stabilisers for rubber or plastics decreased by X% to X tons, falling for the third year in a row after two years of growth. Over the period under review, imports continue to indicate a pronounced setback. The most prominent rate of growth was recorded in 2013 when imports increased by X% against the previous year. As a result, imports attained the peak of X tons. From 2014 to 2016, the growth of imports remained at a somewhat lower figure.

In value terms, anti-oxidising preparations imports dropped rapidly to $X in 2016. In general, imports recorded a abrupt contraction. The smallest decline of X% was in 2015. Over the period under review, imports hit record highs at $X in 2012; however, from 2013 to 2016, imports remained at a lower figure.

Imports by Country

The United States (X tons), Spain (X tons) and Brazil (X tons) were the main suppliers of anti-oxidising preparations imports to Peru, with a combined X% share of total imports.

From 2012 to 2016, the most notable rate of growth in terms of purchases, amongst the main suppliers, was attained by Spain (with a CAGR of X%), while imports for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, the United States ($X) constituted the largest supplier of anti-oxidising preparations and other compounds stabilisers for rubber or plastics to Peru, comprising X% of total imports. The second position in the ranking was held by Brazil ($X), with a X% share of total imports. It was followed by Spain, with a X% share.

From 2012 to 2016, the average annual rate of growth in terms of value from the United States was relatively modest. The remaining supplying countries recorded the following average annual rates of imports growth: Brazil (X% per year) and Spain (X% per year).

Import Prices by Country

The average anti-oxidising preparations import price stood at $X per ton in 2016, declining by X% against the previous year. In general, the import price recorded a pronounced setback. The pace of growth was the most pronounced in 2014 an increase of X%. The import price peaked at $X per ton in 2012; however, from 2013 to 2016, import prices remained at a lower figure.

There were significant differences in the average prices amongst the major supplying countries. In 2016, amid the top importers, the country with the highest price was Italy ($X per ton), while the price for South Korea ($X per ton) was amongst the lowest.

From 2012 to 2016, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Italy (X%), while the prices for the other major suppliers experienced a decline.

Source: IndexBox Platform

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) :