Sweden: Anti-Oxidising Preparations Market 2024

Anti-Oxidising Preparations Market Size in Sweden

The Swedish anti-oxidising preparations market totaled less than $X in 2022, approximately mirroring the previous year. In general, consumption continues to indicate significant growth. Anti-oxidising preparations consumption peaked at $X in 2014; however, from 2015 to 2022, consumption failed to regain momentum.

Anti-Oxidising Preparations Production in Sweden

In value terms, anti-oxidising preparations production amounted to less than $X in 2022 estimated in export price. Over the period under review, production continues to indicate significant growth. The most prominent rate of growth was recorded in 2013 with an increase of X% against the previous year. Anti-oxidising preparations production peaked at $X in 2016; however, from 2017 to 2022, production remained at a lower figure.

Anti-Oxidising Preparations Exports

Exports from Sweden

In 2016, overseas shipments of anti-oxidising preparations and other compounds stabilisers for rubber or plastics increased by X% to X tons, rising for the second consecutive year after two years of decline. Overall, exports, however, saw a deep downturn. The exports peaked at X tons in 2012; however, from 2013 to 2016, the exports remained at a lower figure.

In value terms, anti-oxidising preparations exports surged to $X in 2016. In general, exports, however, continue to indicate a dramatic contraction. The exports peaked at $X in 2012; however, from 2013 to 2016, the exports remained at a lower figure.

Exports by Country

Germany (X tons), Finland (X tons) and Denmark (X tons) were the main destinations of anti-oxidising preparations exports from Sweden, with a combined X% share of total exports. Poland, China, Norway and Belgium lagged somewhat behind, together comprising a further X%.

From 2012 to 2016, the most notable rate of growth in terms of shipments, amongst the main countries of destination, was attained by China (with a CAGR of X.3%), while the other leaders experienced mixed trend patterns.

In value terms, the largest markets for anti-oxidising preparations exported from Sweden were Germany ($X), Finland ($X) and Denmark ($X), with a combined X% share of total exports. Poland, China, Norway and Belgium lagged somewhat behind, together accounting for a further X%.

Among the main countries of destination, China, with a CAGR of X.6%, recorded the highest rates of growth with regard to the value of exports, over the period under review, while shipments for the other leaders experienced mixed trend patterns.

Export Prices by Country

In 2016, the average anti-oxidising preparations export price amounted to $X per ton, dropping by X% against the previous year. Over the period under review, the export price showed a noticeable setback. The most prominent rate of growth was recorded in 2013 an increase of X%. As a result, the export price attained the peak level of $X per ton. From 2014 to 2016, the average export prices remained at a somewhat lower figure.

Prices varied noticeably by country of destination: amid the top suppliers, the country with the highest price was China ($X per ton), while the average price for exports to Finland ($X per ton) was amongst the lowest.

From 2012 to 2016, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was recorded for supplies to China (X%), while the prices for the other major destinations experienced more modest paces of growth.

Anti-Oxidising Preparations Imports

Imports into Sweden

In 2016, overseas purchases of anti-oxidising preparations and other compounds stabilisers for rubber or plastics increased by X% to X tons for the first time since 2013, thus ending a two-year declining trend. The total import volume increased at an average annual rate of X% over the period from 2012 to 2016; the trend pattern remained consistent, with only minor fluctuations being recorded in certain years. The growth pace was the most rapid in 2013 with an increase of X% against the previous year. As a result, imports reached the peak of X tons. From 2014 to 2016, the growth of imports remained at a lower figure.

In value terms, anti-oxidising preparations imports expanded modestly to $X in 2016. Overall, imports, however, showed a noticeable descent. The pace of growth was the most pronounced in 2013 when imports increased by X% against the previous year. As a result, imports attained the peak of $X. From 2014 to 2016, the growth of imports remained at a lower figure.

Imports by Country

In 2016, Germany (X tons) constituted the largest anti-oxidising preparations supplier to Sweden, accounting for a X% share of total imports. Moreover, anti-oxidising preparations imports from Germany exceeded the figures recorded by the second-largest supplier, Italy (X tons), fivefold. Austria (X tons) ranked third in terms of total imports with a X% share.

From 2012 to 2016, the average annual growth rate of volume from Germany amounted to X%. The remaining supplying countries recorded the following average annual rates of imports growth: Italy (X% per year) and Austria (X% per year).

In value terms, Germany ($X) constituted the largest supplier of anti-oxidising preparations and other compounds stabilisers for rubber or plastics to Sweden, comprising X% of total imports. The second position in the ranking was held by Italy ($X), with a X% share of total imports. It was followed by Belgium, with a X% share.

From 2012 to 2016, the average annual rate of growth in terms of value from Germany was relatively modest. The remaining supplying countries recorded the following average annual rates of imports growth: Italy (X% per year) and Belgium (X% per year).

Import Prices by Country

The average anti-oxidising preparations import price stood at $X per ton in 2016, declining by X% against the previous year. Over the period under review, the import price saw a perceptible setback. The pace of growth was the most pronounced in 2014 an increase of X% against the previous year. As a result, import price attained the peak level of $X per ton. From 2015 to 2016, the average import prices failed to regain momentum.

There were significant differences in the average prices amongst the major supplying countries. In 2016, amid the top importers, the country with the highest price was Denmark ($X per ton), while the price for Austria ($X per ton) was amongst the lowest.

From 2012 to 2016, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Denmark (X%), while the prices for the other major suppliers experienced mixed trend patterns.

Source: IndexBox Platform

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) :